Detecting Operator Distraction Through Multivariate Signal Processing

Statistical and Machine Learning Perspectives

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Mihai Constantinov (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Daan M. Pool (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Max Mulder (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS69701.2026.11602332 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Pages (from-to)
52-57
Publisher
IEEE
ISBN (electronic)
9798331545116
Event
2026 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems, ICHMS 2026 (2026-07-01 - 2026-07-03), Singapore, Singapore
Page Views
31
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper compares different multivariate signal processing methods - both based on classical statistical or machine learning models - for detecting human operator distraction in a preview tracking task. Binary Time Series Classification (TSC) methods proposed in prior work, which require both 'non-distracted' and 'distracted' training examples, were found to be out-performed by dedicated Anomaly Detection (AD) methods that aim to detect outliers from a learned 'non-distracted' prior distribution only. Even when applied in an ensemble learning framework, the TSC methods suffer from high false alarms and are highly sensitive to domain shift, due to their explicit reliance on representative 'distracted' training data. The considered statistical AD method, based on calculation of the Mahalanobis Distance (MD) of tested multivariate time-series samples, was found to be outperformed by a machine learning One-Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM) method, as the latter more faithfully captured the (non-normal) distribution of the 'non-distracted' training data. Combining both AD methods in a meta detector only gave marginal improvement in the attained F1 score (0.5694) compared to the OCSVM (0.5610). The presented findings show that statistical and machine learning methods for AD can enable relevant detection of potentially impactful moments of distraction from human control data, which can be tested in real-time monitoring and adaptive support frameworks.

Files

– Personal use only – Dutch Copyright Act (Article 25fa)
warning

File under embargo until 18-01-2027