Between Numbers and Narratives

Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods for Typological Analysis of Dutch Cross Buildings

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Jess Chang (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Casper van Engelenburg (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Marija Mateljan (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Seyran Khademi (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Georg Vrachliotis (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Pages (from-to)
727-736
Publisher
Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA)
ISBN (print)
9789887135906
Event
31st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2026 (2026-04-26 - 2026-05-02), Hsinchu, Taiwan
Page Views
6
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Floor plans are essential sources for morphological studies in architectural history, offering insight into design thinking while opening to quantitative analysis. Yet, key contextual dimensions still rely heavily on the researcher’s interpretation. This study proposes a hybrid method that integrates graph-based similarity measures with human judgment to evaluate typological similarities in floor plans. We demonstrate the approach using a dataset of Dutch cross buildings, a rarely examined building type that served as community care centres. Our findings indicate that computational algorithms can capture nuanced similarity that exceeds human perceptual precision, while also revealing outliers to serve particular historical interests. Additionally, a flow-based algorithm produced numerical results that align closely with the architect's typological interpretation based on circulation. Together, these results offer new ways to understand building types, suggesting that quantitative insights can substantiate historical arguments, prompt new research questions, and extend to other building categories shaped by distinct spatial orders and use patterns.

Files

Caadria2026_151.pdf
(pdf | 1.02 Mb)
License info not available

Download not available