Are Private (Digital) Moneys (Disruptive) Social Innovations? An Exploration of Different Designs

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

M.J. van der Linden (TU Delft - Economics of Technology and Innovation)

Cees Van Beers (TU Delft - Economics of Technology and Innovation)

Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
Copyright
© 2017 M.J. van der Linden, Cees van Beers
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2017.1364287
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 M.J. van der Linden, Cees van Beers
Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
Issue number
3
Volume number
8
Pages (from-to)
302-319
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This article explores which private moneys qualify as (disruptive) social innovations. A case study into 30 Dutch-based complementary currencies and cryptocurrencies was conducted to understand the functioning of different designs of private money systems as well as the motivations and objectives of involved social innovators. We conclude that private moneys generally can be qualified as social innovations but that their potential for disruptiveness is limited by design. It is the externalities that come with the public and network nature of monetary systems that are likely to impede disruption by private (digital) moneys.