Design for Recycling of Electronics

The Urgent Need for Better Methods

Conference Paper (2024)
Author(s)

D.C. Van Dolderen (TU Delft - Design for Sustainability)

S. Aghaeian (TU Delft - Design for Sustainability)

Conny Bakker (TU Delft - Design for Sustainability)

A. Ruud Balkenende (TU Delft - Design for Sustainability)

Research Group
Design for Sustainability
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.23919/EGG62010.2024.10631173
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Design for Sustainability
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
ISBN (electronic)
978-3-00-079330-1
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Within a circular economy, prioritizing product integrity and durability is crucial for circular product design. However, in addition to efforts in strategies like reuse and repair, products inevitably require recycling. This paper critically assesses the current state of Design for Recycling guidelines and methods in the field of electronics, focusing on their Efficacy and Effectiveness. We conducted a literature review using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Following the methodology outlined by Hagen-Zanker and Mallett [1], we identified relevant literature and used snowballing to find additional sources. The search led to 16 articles (1993–2023) proposing methods, tools, guidelines, or frameworks targeting product designers and aimed at the design for improved recyclability of electronics. The final Design for Recycling methods and guidelines were assessed using an adapted version of the method evaluation framework [2] in the context of method content theory [3]. The inclusion of only 18 sources in the review, consisting of nine peer-reviewed and nine non peer-reviewed articles, indicated a limited development in the field since 1993. Many of the methods and guidelines presented were insufficient based on common recycling and design practices, they also lacked validation through recycling tests and were rarely tested with design practitioners. The findings show an urgent need for a substantiated and validated Design for Recycling method, which helps lower the environmental impact of electronics, is tailored to design practitioners, and aligns with common recycling practices.

Files

Design_for_Recycling_of_Electr... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.87 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 22-02-2025
License info not available