Parametric comparison of stability systems

Development of a parametric tool for the comparison and optimisation of four concrete stability systems for high-rise buildings between 100 m and 250 m in an early design phase

More Info
expand_more

Abstract

The aim of this research is to make the early design process more efficient. This is done with a parametric model, which compares high-rise stability systems. The research is focused on the stability systems shear walls, core, outrigger and tube. All systems are executed in concrete cast-in-situ, in the range from 100 to 250 m. The parametric model is executed in Grasshopper and Karamba. Four performance criteria are checked in the model. These are strength, stiffness, foundation design and comfort. An optimisation procedure has been applied to find the most optimal system based on input and optimisation goal. Three optimisation goals have been appointed. These are slenderness of wall and column elements, total weight and carbon emission and flexibility. Flexibility is defined as effective floor area and ratio facade openings. The results of each optimisation goal are plotted with respect to the height to obtain insight in the suitability per system. Input parameters, optimisation procedure and performance criteria have been processed in a tool in Human UI. The model and tool have been applied on De Zalmhaventoren to verify the outcomes. It can be concluded that the model, tool and optimisation results have led to more insight in the high-rise early design process and ease decision making.