How User Manuals Support the Diagnosis of Common Faults in Household Appliances: An Analysis of 150 manuals

Journal Article (2022)
Authors

B. Pozo Arcos (TU Delft - Circular Product Design)

Conny A. Bakker (TU Delft - Circular Product Design)

A. R. Balkenende (TU Delft - Circular Product Design)

Research Group
Circular Product Design
Copyright
© 2022 B. Pozo Arcos, C.A. Bakker, R. Balkenende
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00195-5
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 B. Pozo Arcos, C.A. Bakker, R. Balkenende
Research Group
Circular Product Design
Issue number
1
Volume number
3 (2023)
Pages (from-to)
535-555
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00195-5
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Product repairs are at the core of sustainable consumption and user manuals can play a relevant role in facilitating them. They are the accredited source of product information for end users and are therefore sought as an important means for the diagnosis and subsequent repair of household appliances. However, despite increasing societal demand for repairable products, few studies have been conducted on the extent to which manuals contribute to
the fault diagnosis and subsequent repair process. In this study, we analysed current guidance provided by manuals for the diagnosis process, answering the research question: ‘To what extent do user manuals provide sufficient information to diagnose the most frequent faults in household appliances?’ We examined the diagnosis instructions provided in the user manuals of four different household appliances using data on the appliances’ most frequently failing components, and a framework that considers three steps towards a suc-
cessful diagnosis: fault detection, fault location, and fault isolation. In total, we analysed 150 user manuals of 48 brands available on the European market. We show that manuals do not instruct the diagnosis of frequently failing components. They mainly refer to causes of failure and directly recommend corrective actions after fault detection. Thus, they rarely include a three-step fault diagnosis process to identify and isolate a faulty component.
Based on these results, we have extended the framework for the process of fault diagnosis to include a step from cause identification to corrective action. Both routes, the component- oriented and the cause-oriented route in fault diagnosis, should be considered during the design of products for easy fault diagnosis, and should be included in future regulations that address product reparability