Comment on “Momentum and Energy Predict the Backwater Rise Generated by a Large Wood Jam” by Follett, E., Schalko, I. and Nepf, H.

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

D.W. Poppema (TU Delft - Coastal Engineering)

D. Wüthrich (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Research Group
Coastal Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106348
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Coastal Engineering
Issue number
8
Volume number
51
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Follett et al. (2020a, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl089346) developed an analytical model to predict backwater rise by log jams, using the size and packing density of logs and the jam length, as well as river slope and bed roughness. We show that the model formulas can be rewritten using the Froude number instead of river slope and roughness, thus improving their applicability in engineering practice. The equation terms and results of Follett et al. (2020a, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl089346) are found to be similar to those of the empirically derived formula by Schalko et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001501). However, some differences are identified, calling for further study. Most notably, these distinctions pertain to the effect of accumulation porosity, with additional minor differences in the exponent of the Froude number. Lastly, model implications for some broader applications are explored, showing a methodology to calculate the representative log size for log mixtures, and the expected effect of log orientation on backwater rise.