Predicting plastic strain localization in porous solids using graph neural networks

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Rasmus B. Jakobsen (Aarhus University)

Tobias S. Kristensen (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Aarhus University)

Joep Storm (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Iuri B.C.M. Rocha (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Tito Andriollo (Aarhus University)

Research Group
Applied Mechanics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2026.105733 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Applied Mechanics
Journal title
Mechanics of Materials
Volume number
219
Article number
105733
Downloads counter
3
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

We develop graph-based surrogate models to predict strain localization and collapse load in 2D elastic-perfectly plastic porous solids. Plastic deformation is represented using a Delaunay graph, where nodes correspond to void centers, edges represent potential shear bands, and edge values encode the local integral of the plastic work rate (PWR). Two edge-regression graph neural network (GNN) models are built. The first is a purely data-driven model (DDM) that maps local geometric features – edge length and orientation – to PWR. The second is a hybrid model (HM) that augments the GNN with a mechanistic prior from a limit load analysis model (LLAM) and learns a correction to its upper-bound bias. The models are trained on a dataset of 1200 representative volume elements with 20% porosity. The DDM can reliably reconstruct shear band patterns, but its accuracy deteriorates when applied to porosity values different from that seen in training. The HM, like the LLAM, does not fully capture the spatial pattern, but it removes the LLAM systematic bias and achieves uniformly low errors in total work rate for porosities ranging from 10% to 30%. Moreover, the HM requires less training data than the DDM and is more robust across random seeds. These results show that coupling a GNN with a physics-based prior yields a fast and data-efficient surrogate that preserves accuracy in macroscopic quantities while retaining meaningful spatial information, thereby offering a practical route to predict the collapse of porous solids while accounting for the exact locations of a very large number of voids.