Effect of parameter variation on the viscosity of ethanol gel propellants

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Chloé Carer (Student TU Delft)

Leonhard Xaver Driever (Student TU Delft)

Stein Köbben (Student TU Delft)

Max McKenzie (Student TU Delft)

Fredrik Rhenman (Student TU Delft)

Onno Van de Sype (Student TU Delft)

Jesse van der Toorn (Student TU Delft)

Casper van Wezel (Student TU Delft)

Constança Miranda de Andrade Veiga (Student TU Delft)

Aleksandrs Vinarskis (Student TU Delft)

Botchu Vara Siva Jyoti (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1590/jatm.v13.1196 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Volume number
13
Article number
e1121
Pages (from-to)
1-13
Downloads counter
477
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This research investigated how the variation of temperature and shear rate affects the viscosity of ethanol gel propellants that use methyl cellulose as gellant and, in parts, use boron as energetic additive. Using a rotational viscometer in a cone-and-plate configuration, propellant viscosity data was recorded across a range of temperatures and applied shear rates. The temperaturedependence of the viscosity was modelled using an Arrhenius-type equation. For the high shear rates, the data was modelled using the Power Law, Herrschel–Bulkley model, Carreau model, and Cross model. For low shear rates the used model was the rearranged Herrschel–Bulkley model. The temperature investigation suggested that the trend of decreasing viscosity with increasing temperature, predicted by the Arrhenius-type equation, is only applicable until approximately 320 K, after which the gel viscosity increased strongly. At high shear rates, the gel behaved in a shear thinning manner and was modelled most accurately by the Cross model. At low shear rates, the gel was shear thickening up to its elastic limit, which was found to lie at 0.41 s–1.