Examining the role of intrinsic and reflexive contributions to ankle joint hyper-resistance treated with botulinum toxin-A
Ronald C. Van 't Veld (University of Twente)
E. Flux (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
Wieneke van Oorschot (Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen)
Alfred Schouten (University of Twente, TU Delft - Biomechanical Engineering)
M. M. van der Krogt (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
Herman van der Kooij (TU Delft - Support Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente)
Marije Vos-van der Hulst (Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen)
Noël L.W. Keijsers (Radboud University Medical Center, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen)
Edwin van Asseldonk (University of Twente)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Background: Spasticity, i.e. stretch hyperreflexia, increases joint resistance similar to symptoms like hypertonia and contractures. Botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) injections are a widely used intervention to reduce spasticity. BoNT-A effects on spasticity are poorly understood, because clinical measures, e.g. modified Ashworth scale (MAS), cannot differentiate between the symptoms affecting joint resistance. This paper distinguishes the contributions of the reflexive and intrinsic pathways to ankle joint hyper-resistance for participants treated with BoNT-A injections. We hypothesized that the overall joint resistance and reflexive contribution decrease 6 weeks after injection, while returning close to baseline after 12 weeks. Methods: Nine participants with spasticity after spinal cord injury or after stroke were evaluated across three sessions: 0, 6 and 12 weeks after BoNT-A injection in the calf muscles. Evaluation included clinical measures (MAS, Tardieu Scale) and motorized instrumented assessment using the instrumented spasticity test (SPAT) and parallel-cascade (PC) system identification. Assessments included measures for: (1) overall resistance from MAS and fast velocity SPAT; (2) reflexive resistance contribution from Tardieu Scale, difference between fast and slow velocity SPAT and PC reflexive gain; and (3) intrinsic resistance contribution from slow velocity SPAT and PC intrinsic stiffness/damping. Results: Individually, the hypothesized BoNT-A effect, the combination of a reduced resistance (week 6) and return towards baseline (week 12), was observed in the MAS (5 participants), fast velocity SPAT (2 participants), Tardieu Scale (2 participants), SPAT (1 participant) and reflexive gain (4 participants). On group-level, the hypothesis was only confirmed for the MAS, which showed a significant resistance reduction at week 6. All instrumented measures were strongly correlated when quantifying the same resistance contribution. Conclusion: At group-level, the expected joint resistance reduction due to BoNT-A injections was only observed in the MAS (overall resistance). This observed reduction could not be attributed to an unambiguous group-level reduction of the reflexive resistance contribution, as no instrumented measure confirmed the hypothesis. Validity of the instrumented measures was supported through a strong association between different assessment methods. Therefore, further quantification of the individual contributions to joint resistance changes using instrumented measures across a large sample size are essential to understand the heterogeneous response to BoNT-A injections.
help_outline