On the Neural Correlates of Motor Imagery With an Extra Virtual Arm
Daniel Leal Pinheiro (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Leonardo Pollina (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Karin A. Buetler (University of Bern)
Laura Marchal-Crespo (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering, Erasmus MC)
Solaiman Shokur (Università Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Silvestro Micera (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Motor augmentation (MA) is an emerging field at the intersection of engineering, robotics, and neuroscience, aiming to enhance human capabilities through the integration of extra limbs. This concept leverages the body’s physiological redundancies, including those within the nervous system. This study examined motor imagery (MI) involving a virtual extra arm, focusing on differentiating its neural patterns from those of biological limbs. Thirty participants performed unimanual reaching MI tasks before (Pre) and after (Post) a conditioning phase in a virtual environment, during which half of the participants received tactile feedback on the movement of the extra arm. Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings revealed distinct event-related desynchronization (ERD) in α and β rhythms between the extra and biological limbs. Additionally, a Riemannian decoder successfully classified MI for the left, right, and extra virtual arm, providing further evidence of distinct neural patterns. While the conditioning played a role in the ERD’s neural signatures, we did not find the same effects on the decoding. We believe that more complex movements, other sensory encoding modalities, or longer conditioning periods would likely strengthen the connection between tactile feedback and neural control.