Creative space

A systematic review of the literature

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

K. Thoring (TU Delft - Form and Experience, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences Dessau)

Pieter Desmet (TU Delft - Form and Experience)

P. Badke-Schaub (TU Delft - DesIgning Value in Ecosystems)

Research Group
Form and Experience
Copyright
© 2019 K.C. Thoring, P.M.A. Desmet, P.G. Badke-Schaub
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.33
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 K.C. Thoring, P.M.A. Desmet, P.G. Badke-Schaub
Research Group
Form and Experience
Volume number
2019-August
Pages (from-to)
299-308
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the state-of-the-art research about creative work and learning environments. We conducted a systematic literature search within the Scopus database and identified a total of 70 relevant sources discussing creative spaces within academic, practice, or other innovation environments. Among the included sources are 48 academic publications and 22 sources from company research and illustrative coffee-table books that are discussed separately. We analyse the academic sources regarding their theoretical contribution, as well as regarding their scope. Finally, the included sources are categorized according to three areas of interest: (1) the addressed space types for different creative activities, (2) abstracted requirements for creative spaces, and (3) concrete characteristics and configurations of a creative space. The results provide an in-depth insight into the current state of research on the topic of creative spaces. Practitioners, educators, and researchers can use the presented overview to investigate the possible impact of creative workspace design and to identify research gaps for conducting further research in the field.