Safety, identity, and inequity at the last mile

a qualitative study of app-based bicycle delivery riders in Spain

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Sergio A. Useche (Universidad de Valencia (ICMol))

Francisco J. Llamazares (ESIC University)

Cristina Marin (ESIC University)

Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Safety and Security Science
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107180 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Safety and Security Science
Journal title
Safety Science
Volume number
199
Article number
107180
Downloads counter
23
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The expansion of the gig economy has led to a growing number of urban workers engaged in app-based food delivery. This sector, often seen as flexible, conceals complex occupational, legal, and psychosocial risks. Recent evidence suggests that delivery riders’ safety is shaped not only by infrastructure or individual behavior, but also by precarious work conditions, limited legal protections, and forms of social exclusion that remain largely unaddressed. Aim This qualitative study examined how safety, identity, and equity are experienced and negotiated in app-based bicycle delivery in Spain, with attention to algorithmic timing, organizational rules, and street-level conditions. Methods Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with food delivery riders (mostly migrant men) in urban areas of Spain. A reflexive thematic analysis (inductive) was applied, with attention to patterns, contrasts across cases, and speech insights suggesting broader socio-labor dynamics. Results Three core themes were identified: (1) persistent exposure to traffic and environmental hazards, often aggravated by digital pressures and limited enforcement of safety regulations; (2) a fragmented social identity, with riders feeling excluded from both formal labor structures and mainstream cycling culture; and (3) strong perceptions of systemic inequity, including legal precarity, economic fragility, and marginalization in public and policy narratives, which may influence how riders manage risk in practice (e.g., rule compliance, incident reporting) and, in turn, safety outcomes. Conclusion The findings highlight the vulnerabilities of bicycle food delivery riders and suggest the need to rethink how safety, labor protections, and urban inclusion are framed and implemented in this sector.