Review of methods for assessing the climate impacts of aviation technologies and the resulting best practices

Review (2026)
Author(s)

Volker Grewe (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Svitlana Zhukovska (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

Katrin Dahlmann (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

Sigrun Matthes (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

Liam Megill (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

Pascal Bertram (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

Patrick Ratei (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

Prajwal Prakasha (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

Florian Linke (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

More Authors (External organisation)

Research Group
Operations & Environment
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-026-00980-0 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Related content
Research Group
Operations & Environment
Journal title
CEAS Aeronautical Journal
Page Views
17
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The climate impact of aviation resulting from both emissions and effects is gaining attention from aviation stakeholders seeking to identify potential mitigation options. There is a need to consolidate the use of assessment methods and climate metrics, which are required to convert aviation effects into -equivalent emissions. We provide an overview of the operational, technological and scenario-based climate impact assessment methods that have been applied in literature as well as considerations and requirements for the choice of climate metric. We propose a four-layer technology climate impact assessment methodology, which includes: (1) the technology parameters, such as entry into service and temporal and spatial network use; (2) the calculation of three-dimensional aircraft trajectories and emission inventories; (3) the calculation of radiative forcing and induced temperature change time series; and (4) the overall climate impact, measured using a climate metric. We recommend two climate metrics that best fulfill the requirements, the Average Temperature Response (ATR100) and the Efficacy-weighted Global Warming Potential (EGWP100), both over 100 years. Additionally, we discuss further steps, such as the understanding of the most sensitive parameters in this approach, how uncertainties can be included to provide robust estimates, aspects of verification and update possibilities for new findings in research.