The quadrature method

A novel dipole localisation algorithm for artificial lateral lines compared to state of the art

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Daniël M. Bot (University of Hasselt)

B.J. Wolf (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, TU Delft - Team Bart De Schutter)

Sietse M. van Netten (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)

Research Group
Team Bart De Schutter
Copyright
© 2021 Daniël M. Bot, B.J. Wolf, Sietse M. van Netten
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134558
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 Daniël M. Bot, B.J. Wolf, Sietse M. van Netten
Research Group
Team Bart De Schutter
Issue number
13
Volume number
21
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The lateral line organ of fish has inspired engineers to develop flow sensor arrays— dubbed artificial lateral lines (ALLs)—capable of detecting near-field hydrodynamic events for obstacle avoidance and object detection. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review and comparison of ten localisation algorithms for ALLs. Differences in the studied domain, sensor sensitivity axes, and available data prevent a fair comparison between these algorithms from their original works. We compare them with our novel quadrature method (QM), which is based on a geometric property specific to 2D-sensitive ALLs. We show how the area in which each algorithm can accurately determine the position and orientation of a simulated dipole source is affected by (1) the amount of training and optimisation data, and (2) the sensitivity axes of the sensors. Overall, we find that each algorithm benefits from 2D-sensitive sensors, with alternating sensitivity axes as the second-best configuration. From the machine learning approaches, an MLP required an impractically large training set to approach the optimisation-based algorithms’ performance. Regardless of the data set size, QM performs best with both a large area for accurate predictions and a small tail of large errors.