Autonomous UAV Landing on Stochastic Maritime Targets

A reinforcement learning approach for maritime UAV applications

Master Thesis (2025)
Author(s)

H.S. Hennecken (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Contributor(s)

M.J. Ribeiro – Mentor (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

O. Pfeifle – Mentor (Royal Netherlands Aerospace Centre)

E. van Kampen – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

J.S. Sun – Mentor (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Graduation Date
11-11-2025
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Aerospace Engineering
Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Downloads counter
112
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Reliable autonomous recovery of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) on moving maritime platforms remains a critical challenge, primarily due to complex, stochastic deck motion, particularly vertical heave, and unpredictable environmental disturbances. Existing Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches often simplify this environment, limiting their real-world applicability. This thesis investigates the robustness trade-offs of RL-based guidance controllers under realistic, high-dynamicity maritime conditions. We benchmarked a classical Proportional-IntegralDerivative (PID) controller against two RL architectures trained using Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) in a high-fidelity PyBullet simulation: a Full RL 3D controller and a novel Hybrid RL 1D controller, which strategically applies RL only to the critical, stochastic vertical (heave) axis. The results demonstrate that the Hybrid RL 1D architecture (86.6% success rate) achieved superior overall robustness and efficiency. Notably, the RL controllers dramatically reduced average landing time (RL_1D: 3.31 s vs. Baseline: 11.51 s), though the classical PID baseline maintained higher horizontal precision (Err𝑋𝑌 of 0.17 ± 0.17 m ). The Hybrid RL 1D maintained a superior success rate up to 89% in high sea states (SS7) and exhibited greater resilience to sensor noise. However, a critical limitation was identified: both RL-based policies experienced a pronounced performance collapse under strong, untrained wind disturbances, a regime where the non-adaptive classical PID baseline proved unexpectedly stable. These findings confirm the benefits of hybrid control for maximizing robustness and highlight that the system’s ability to handle wind disturbance rejection remains a significant, unresolved shortcoming for current RL guidance systems.

Files

MSc_Thesis_Hennecken.pdf
(pdf | 1.87 Mb)
License info not available