Resilient conflict detection and resolution for high-uncertainty constrained urban airspace operations

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

C. Badea (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Joost Ellerbroek (TU Delft - Operations & Environment)

Andrija Vidosavljevic (Ecole Nationale de L’Aviation Civile)

J.M. Hoekstra (TU Delft - Operations & Environment)

Operations & Environment
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101700
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Operations & Environment
Volume number
34
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The concept of urban air mobility is rapidly advancing, with much research being dedicated towards the development of the air traffic management services required for such operations. An important component of unmanned air traffic management (U-space/UTM) is conflict detection and resolution (CD&R), tasked with ensuring the operational safety of such systems. Strategic flight plan optimisation and tactical CD&R methods have generally been studied independently, leading to suboptimal performance when deployed simultaneously in simulated high-density very-low-level constrained urban airspace environments. Furthermore, the limited flexibility of pre-departure 4D trajectory planning methods towards dynamic and uncertain environmental and operational conditions (i.e., wind and delay) produces a degradation in safety that is difficult to mitigate using tactical manoeuvring. In this work, we design a traffic-flow capacity strategic optimisation method that aims to achieve robustness against flight plan deviations and to better complement tactical CD&R manoeuvring. The performance of the proposed strategic and tactical deconfliction module is tested within constrained urban airspace traffic scenarios simulated using the BlueSky Open Air Traffic Simulator. The results are compared with other methods, such as 4D trajectory planning and state-based CD&R.