Application of a simplified model for assessing particle removal in dissolved air flotation (DAF) systems

Experimental verification at laboratory and full-scale level

Journal Article (2024)
Authors

Antonella L. Piaggio (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

G Smith (Nijhuis Saur Industries)

Merle K. de Kreuk (TU Delft - Water Management)

R.E.F. Lindeboom (TU Delft - Laboratory Water Management)

Department
Water Management
Copyright
© 2024 A.L. Piaggio, Geo Smith, M.K. de Kreuk, R.E.F. Lindeboom
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.126801
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Copyright
© 2024 A.L. Piaggio, Geo Smith, M.K. de Kreuk, R.E.F. Lindeboom
Department
Water Management
Volume number
340
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.126801
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Particle-bubble collisions in dissolved air flotation (DAF) systems play a crucial role in the removal of total suspended solids (TSS). DAF particle-bubble collision models incorporate factors such as particle diameters, charge and density, bubble diameters, and collision factors. The challenge lies in accounting for the wide range of particle and bubble sizes and obtaining complex model inputs. To address this, a simplified model for TSS removal in DAF units was established using low-cost laboratory measurements, including particle size distribution and density. Additionally, microbubble diameter profiles were derived from bubble velocities using particle image velocimetry software (PIV). Six independent variables, encompassing influent particle characteristics (such as particle size distribution and density) and DAF running characteristics (temperature, contact zone detention time, inflow and recycle flows), were employed in the simplified model. The model's accuracy was evaluated using a laboratory-scale DAF system with two different influents: Delft canal water and anaerobic sludge. The predicted TSS removal from the simplified model aligned well with the laboratory-scale DAF results, yielding removal efficiencies of 68 ± 1 % and 77 ± 3 % for Delft canal water and anaerobic sludge, respectively. Furthermore, when the simplified model was applied to two full-scale DAF systems, it successfully identified an underperforming system (DAF2) with a TSS removal efficiency of 91 %, contrasting with the theoretical removal model-predicted efficiency of 98 %. This study highlights the utility of combining bubble size distribution measured by PIVlab and particle size distribution obtained using FIJI-ImageJ as an economical and efficient approach to acquiring the necessary inputs for predicting TSS removal in DAF systems.