Machine learning-based assessment tool for predicting daylight and visual comfort

Master Thesis (2022)
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Copyright
© 2022 Maryamsadat Aboueimehrizi
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Maryamsadat Aboueimehrizi
Graduation Date
03-11-2022
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences | Building Technology
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Early design choices in building shape and fenestration significantly influ- ence the yearly daylight performance of office buildings. Annual daylight performance must be analyzed at the conceptual design stage to support building form and fenestration design decisions. However, the simulation modeling and daylight calculations necessary for the annual daylight fore- cast are extraordinarily time-consuming, which negatively influences its early design viability. Machine learning-based methods that experimentally learn from simulation-derived data have been implemented to decrease the time of daylight simulations. We concentrate on the visual comfort of working en- vironments. This particular sort of area demands more visual comfort than others. Four machine-learning methods are compared concerning their appli- cability in spatial daylight autonomy, annual sunlight exposure, and spatially disturbing glare. This research proposes a machine learning-based modeling strategy for predicting yearly daylight performance early in the design stage. The developed prediction model results for the sDA(Spatial Daylight Auton- omy), ASE (Annual Sunlight exposure), and sDG(Spatial Disturbing Glare) settings. After comparing the models for each output the best chosen model attained R2 scores of 0.85, 0.65, and 0.26 and MAE scores of 3.33, 22.5, and 22.16, respectively.

Files

Final_research_report.pdf
(pdf | 17.4 Mb)
License info not available
P5_Presentation.pdf
(pdf | 4.78 Mb)
License info not available
Reflection_P4.pdf
(pdf | 0.0682 Mb)
License info not available
Graduation_Plan.pdf
(pdf | 0.303 Mb)
License info not available