The role of participation in the responsible innovation framework for biofuels projects

Can it be assessed?

Journal Article (2020)
Authors

Andreia Postal (University of Campinas, TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Gabriela Solidario de Souza Benatti (University of Campinas, TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Mar Parada (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Lotte Asveld (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Patrícia Osseweijer (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

José Maria F.J. Da Silveira (University of Campinas)

Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Copyright
© 2020 Andreia Marques Postal, G. Solidario de Souza Benatti, M.D.M. Palmeros Parada, L. Asveld, P. Osseweijer, José Maria F.J. Da Silveira
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410581
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Andreia Marques Postal, G. Solidario de Souza Benatti, M.D.M. Palmeros Parada, L. Asveld, P. Osseweijer, José Maria F.J. Da Silveira
Research Group
BT/Biotechnology and Society
Issue number
24
Volume number
12
Pages (from-to)
1-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410581
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The growth in biofuels’ investment brings with it concerns about the social and environmental impacts of the sector. Several tools and frameworks have been used to address these concerns, including the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) framework. This paper analyzes whether this framework can be applied in contexts where local culture and values shape differently the freedom of speech and engagement, such as in developing countries in which biofuel innovation projects are often implemented. A literature review focused on eight case studies of other authors was used to explore the role of “participation” as a structural element of the RRI framework and the impact of its absence where effective participation in the innovation development process is not possible. In conclusion, we highlight how this inspirational normative framework, designed to influence innovation, is misused to judge its impacts. More than that, the conclusions of such misused applications reflect more the difficulties involved in applying guidelines than the responsible character of the innovation, whose impacts are usually defined upfront materially and measurably.

Files

License info not available