Explosion induced domino effect assessment in the process industries

A machine learning approach to improve probit models

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Min Jiang (Southwest Petroleum University, TU Delft - ImPhys/Optics)

Yu Yang (Southwest Petroleum University)

Jiexiang Bian (Southwest Petroleum University)

Mengru Fang (Southwest Petroleum University)

Valerio Cozzani (University of Bologna)

Genserik Reniers (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Chao Chen (Southwest Petroleum University)

Research Group
Safety and Security Science
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105714
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Safety and Security Science
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Journal title
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
Volume number
98
Article number
105714
Downloads counter
134
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Explosion-induced domino accidents in the chemical industry, such as the 2005 Buncefield and 2019 Xiangshui accidents, can lead to catastrophic losses. Recent studies commonly use probit models (simplified linear regression models) to predict the probability of accident escalation caused by equipment failure due to overpressure conditions but necessitate distinct equations for different equipment types. In order to simplify the number of models and improve their accuracy, this study introduced three machine learning models (random forest model, convolutional neural network model, and deep neural network model), addressing complex nonlinear relationships that conventional regression models may not fully capture. By model training, the DNN model has the highest accuracy (99 %), followed by CNN (94 %) and random RF (95 %). The DNN model was selected as the optimal data-driven model for equipment vulnerability assessment due to their feedforward mechanism's capability to dynamically align parameters with evolving data distributions. The approach developed can not only predict the probability of equipment damage by integrating values related to peak overpressure and equipment type but also effectively address the accuracy validation issues associated with traditional regression models. Besides, this approach can be considered open source model and more explosion data may be used in the future to further improve the model.

Files

1-s2.0-S095042302500172X-main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 4.29 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 17-12-2025
License info not available