Comparison and validation of spatial reference evapotranspiration datasets over Africa

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Suzan Dehati (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Wageningen University & Research)

Bich Ngoc Tran (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, TU Delft - Water Systems Monitoring & Modelling)

Poolad Karimi (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Marloes Mul (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Research Group
Water Systems Monitoring & Modelling
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2600684
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Water Systems Monitoring & Modelling
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is an important variable for water resources management and agricultural planning. Some regions, including Africa lack sufficient in-situ meteorological measurements to represent the climatic conditions. Open-access Global ET0 data sets present a viable alternative that could potentially fill the gap. This study compares eight spatial ET0 data sets against ET0 estimated from 165 weather stations across Africa. Performance was assessed using statistical metrics, including R2, Bias, RMSE, and RBias. Findings reveal that high-resolution data sets align better with in-situ data in temperate and tropical climates compared to low-resolution data sets. Results for arid regions appear to show low performance for all data sets, but results are less certain due to the availability of stations in this climate. This study also reveals that the input data contribute to 60–70% of the variability between data sets, with the remainder contributed by different model implementation, indicating the importance of good quality of input data.