Cooperating for added value

Using participatory game theory in implementing nature-based flood defences

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

H. Vreugdenhil (TU Delft - Policy Analysis, Deltares)

Stephanie Janssen (Deltares)

L Hermans (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, TU Delft - Policy Analysis)

Jill Slinger (TU Delft - Policy Analysis, Rhodes University)

Research Group
Policy Analysis
Copyright
© 2022 H.S.I. Vreugdenhil, Stephanie Janssen, L.M. Hermans, J Slinger
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106507
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 H.S.I. Vreugdenhil, Stephanie Janssen, L.M. Hermans, J Slinger
Research Group
Policy Analysis
Volume number
176
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The increasingly active role of stakeholders in the development of innovative nature-based solutions calls for appropriate instruments to support and realise added value from their involvement. In this paper we apply a newly developed instrument “Cooperation for Added Value” (Co-Add) to a study area on the Dutch coast. The instrument draws on participatory game theory and policy analysis to provide a theoretically sound structure for facilitating interactions aimed at identifying shared opportunities and potential coalitions for cooperation. The application in the case study Noard-Fryslân Bûtendyks affirmed that the Co-Add instrument systematically facilitated stakeholders in exploring potentially promising opportunities and gaining insight in the added value of engaging in diverse cooperations. Stakeholders came to understand which solutions were more achievable than others and what was needed to enable implementation in terms of collaboration, including the role of their own organization. Furthermore, social dilemmas in which a particular nature-based solution is attractive to a coalition of stakeholders but is not the most beneficial solution for a particular individual stakeholder, became clear. This represents a practical contribution to the range of participatory instruments that can be applied in societally challenging complex problems that require collaboration for their resolution.