De-centering the (Traditional) user
Multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems
Robin Burke (University of Colorado - Boulder)
Gediminas Adomavicius (University of Minnesota)
Toine Bogers (IT University of Copenhagen)
Tommaso Di Noia (Politecnico di Bari)
Dominik Kowald (Graz University of Technology)
Julia Neidhardt (Technische Universität Wien)
Özlem Özgöbek (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
Maria Soledad Pera (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)
Nava Tintarev (Maastricht University)
Jürgen Ziegler (Universität Duisburg-Essen)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, these systems cannot be evaluated strictly by the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the challenges of multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved—from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limited to providers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. We discuss how to move from theoretical principles to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. We aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about incorporating these complex and domain-dependent issues of evaluation in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.
Files
File under embargo until 26-01-2026