The concept of relevance in Information Retrieval (IR) has been extensively studied. However, most mainstream IR models have been developed with adult users in mind, assuming cognitive maturity and autonomous interaction. Younger searchers, who increasingly integrate IR systems into their information-seeking practices, differ in cognitive abilities, information needs, and limited digital knowledge, which shape how they judge relevance, often diverging from traditional definitions assumed to work for adults. This calls for a deeper understanding of how this underrepresented group judges online content. In this study, we explore how children interpret and determine relevance when searching for information online in primary school classrooms. As information-seeking in this context is often guided by teachers, we also probe their criteria for relevance. By comparing both perspectives, we uncover points of alignment and divergence. These findings contribute to revisiting the concept of relevance for the primary school context and, more broadly, to the design and evaluation of equitable, context-aware IR systems that support responsible and inclusive information seeking practices.

Query performance prediction (QPP) methods have primarily been tailored to mainstream users, thus relying on the traditional concept of relevance. In the case of children, however, relevance goes beyond content-based resource-query matching, which is why we gauge the performance of existing QPP methods in estimating the fit of resources retrieved in response to child-formulated queries. Outcomes from our empirical exploration of various QPP methods using a traditional and a child-focused definition of relevance on 2 datasets reveal the limitations in the adaptability of existing methods to the context of child information retrieval.

Agents based on Large Language Models (LLM) have introduced a new way of information seeking that could simplify the search process to suit children’s cognitive skills, as these agents often respond to natural language inquiries with easy-to-read and plausible answers. Still, with emotions playing a crucial role in children’s information seeking and consumption behaviours, it is important to consider whether these agents suit children’s emotional intelligence. With that in mind, in this work, we examine the emotional undertones of LLM agent responses for children’s inquiries. Considering the known impact of prompt engineering on an agent’s response, we investigate whether explicitly informing an agent that the user is a child influences the emotions conveyed in its response. Outcomes from this empirical study reveal the limitations of LLM agents to fit children’s emotional intelligence, with agents tending to over-amplify any underlying emotion in a child’s inquiry. With our findings, we advance knowledge in the role of emotions in children’s online search and offer insights that could be used to improve children’s online information access.

In 2011, Xavier Amatriain sounded the alarm: recommender systems research was “doing it all wrong” [1]. His critique, rooted in statistical misinterpretation and methodological shortcuts, remains as relevant today as it was then. But rather than correcting course, we added new layers of sophistication on top of the same broken foundations. This paper revisits Amatriain’s diagnosis and argues that many of the conceptual, epistemological, and infrastructural failures he identified still persist, in more subtle or systemic forms. Drawing on recent work in reproducibility, evaluation methodology, environmental impact, and participatory design, we showcase how the field’s accelerating complexity has outpaced its introspection. We highlight ongoing community-led initiatives that attempt to shift the paradigm, including workshops, evaluation frameworks, and calls for value-sensitive and participatory research. At the same time, we contend that meaningful change will require not only new metrics or better tooling, but a fundamental reframing of what recommender systems research is for, who it serves, and how knowledge is produced and validated. Our call is not just for technical reform, but for a recommender systems research agenda grounded in epistemic humility, human impact, and sustainable practice.

Simulation is widely used in recommender systems research to study algorithm behavior and its impact on users. A common strategy involves adopting a universal choice model to represent users, assuming all follow the same consumption patterns. This one-size-fits-all approach overlooks the diversity in user preferences and decision-making patterns. In this work, we scrutinize whether this universal view fails to account for unique user behavior, thus harming realism and reliability of simulation outcomes. We conduct multiple simulations with various recommendation algorithms and choice models in the movie domain, comparing outcomes to users’ organic consumption patterns. Further, we evaluate whether a holistic model that captures users’ differences in behavior would better reflect a wide user base. Our findings highlight the limitations of using a naive, universal choice model and emphasize the need for more nuanced, user-specific approaches to make contributions from simulation studies more reflective of real-world effects.

The rise of digital platforms for accessing online content-from popular search engines to social media sites- has contributed to the (un)intentional propagation of misleading information. This phenomenon, known as Information Disorder, affects individuals and society. Extensive research has been conducted to study and address Information Disorder as it pertains to the general population. Yet, little is known about how children, who have specific needs and behaviours when interacting with digital content, deal with misleading information and how the algorithms, that underlay the information access tools they use, mitigate or exacerbate the issue. Through a systematic literature review, we present research efforts that address or discuss the impact of Information Disorder on children and their overall information-seeking experience. We analyse the literature from various perspectives, including children's behaviour across platforms and the solutions developed to mitigate misleading information. Inspired by the knowledge distilled and gaps identified in our review, we discuss research directions that tackle both technological and human-centred challenges children face when dealing with misleading information, seeking to establish a foundation to mitigate the effects of Information Disorder among children.

The way people seek, access, and use information for learning has changed. Once the primary gateway to information, search engines now share the stage with various digital/social platforms. This change is perhaps more notable among teenagers and has undoubtedly influenced how they browse and select resources to support their learning. To understand their habits and how alternatives to search engines have influenced them, in this work, we explore how high school students conduct online inquiries in the classroom. Our findings reveal that search engines are not always students’ first choice; social networks often play a leading role. This shift has important implications for the design of information retrieval technology, as researchers should consider how teenagers—an understudied population—use this range of tools. In addition, it is critical to foster search and media literacy skills among young users, who increasingly turn to tools not designed to search for information for educational purposes.

Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, these systems cannot be evaluated strictly by the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the challenges of multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved—from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limited to providers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. We discuss how to move from theoretical principles to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. We aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about incorporating these complex and domain-dependent issues of evaluation in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.

In this work, we reason how focusing on Information Retrieval (IR) for children and involving them in participatory studies would benefit the IR community. The Child Computer Interaction (CCI) community has embraced the child as a protagonist as their main philosophy, regarding children as informants, co-designers, and evaluators, not just users. Leveraging prior literature, we posit that putting children in the centre of the IR world and giving them an active role could enable the IR community to break free from the preexisting bias derived from interpretations inferred from past use by adult users and the still dominant system-oriented approach. This shift would allow researchers to revisit complex foundational concepts that greatly influence the use of IR tools as part of socio-technical systems in different domains. In doing so, IR practitioners could provide more inclusive, and supportive information access experiences to children and other understudied user groups alike in different contexts.