Enhancing the Interpretability of 3D City Model Validation Through Web Visualization: The Case Study of the CHEK Validation Results Viewer

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Alper T. Akın (Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Alejandro Villar (Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC))

Abdoulaye Diakite (CityGeometrix Pty Ltd)

Siham El Yamani (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Jantien Stoter (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Francesca Noardo (Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC))

Robert Atkinson (Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC))

Piotr Zaborowski (Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC))

Department
Urbanism
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15070282 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Department
Urbanism
Journal title
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Issue number
7
Volume number
15
Article number
282
Downloads counter
31
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

3D city models (3DCMs) are increasingly used in urban simulations, cadastral workflows, and digital building permit processes, and automated validation of these models has become a routine requirement. Existing validation services typically produce dense, frequently generated by SHACL engines, text-based reports that are difficult for users without a semantic-web background to interpret. This paper describes the CHEK Validation Results Viewer (CHEK VRV), a Flask-based web application that couples the OGC Data Completeness Validator with an interactive Three.js 3D viewer of the CityJSON input. SHACL violations and geometric invalidities are spatially explorable on a visual representation of the model, and the tool supports both predefined CHEK Building Block Profiles and user-uploaded custom profiles. We report a formative usability study with twelve domain experts (urban planners, data vendors, academics) and use it to identify the tool’s current strengths, its limitations, and a prioritized development roadmap. As reported by the participant experts, such a presentation is easier to interpret than the raw JSON-LD report.