Model Predictive Control for Helicopter Flight Control

Evaluating Linear and Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Reducing Cross-coupling Effects in Helicopter Flight

Master Thesis (2021)
Author(s)

L. Wellens (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Contributor(s)

M. D. Pavel – Mentor (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Ana Jamshidnejad – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Copyright
© 2021 Lotte Wellens
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 Lotte Wellens
Coordinates
51.990279, 4.375461
Graduation Date
12-04-2021
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Aerospace Engineering | Control & Simulation']
Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Model predictive control is an optimal, model-based control method that has the powerful capability of directly including input and output constraints. Next to this, it is known that helicopters are hard to fly with its complex, unstable and highly coupled dynamics. With the introduction of the concept of handling qualities, guidelines for helicopter and flight control system design were set in the ADS-33 document to improve the ease of controlling rotorcraft. In order to improve helicopter handling qualities, this paper investigates whether linear and nonlinear MPC are suitable for online application to helicopters to reduce cross-coupling effects. This was investigated by evaluating its performance on the cross-coupling requirements of the ADS-33 handling quality document. It was found that both linear and nonlinear MPC are very effective to reduce cross-coupling effects even when disturbances or prediction model errors are present. The model predictive controller could reduce the off-axis coupling response by around 99% compared to the uncontrolled helicopter. Furthermore, it performed 90% to 99% better than a PID controller in most coupling cases.

Files

License info not available
License info not available