On the accuracy of multi-exposure 3D-PTV

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

A. Grille Guerra (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

B. Wieneke (LaVision)

F. Scarano (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Research Group
Aerodynamics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-026-04225-y Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Aerodynamics
Journal title
Experiments in Fluids
Issue number
6
Volume number
67
Article number
65
Downloads counter
37
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Multi-exposure (ME) 3D particle tracking velocimetry (3D-PTV) is a specific recording variant whereby more than two samples of the particle position are obtained to overcome some limitations of single-exposure double-frame recordings, such as accelerometry, pressure from PIV, or to further extend the dynamic velocity range. Compared to time-resolved (TR) systems, ME lowers system requirements in terms of laser power and camera frame rate. Although proved viable only recently using asymmetric timing sequences, a systematic assessment of ME 3D-PTV robustness and accuracy that covers both single-frame and double-frame recording is missing, which is the aim of the present work. The reliability and accuracy of particle tracking in ME recordings comprising up to 5 exposures with one or two frames are first scrutinized on a synthetic particle field motion based on a Taylor–Green vortex lattice. Single-frame ME yields viable results, with a detection rate of 90% up to a cumulated particle image density of 10% (cppp = 0.1). The error rate, however, remains below 5% only when the exposures are distributed over two frames. The measurement accuracy in terms of dynamic velocity and acceleration ranges is reported, as a function of particle image density, number of pulses and timing sequence. The results suggest approximate equivalence to the time-resolved systems in terms of dynamic velocity range (DVR). The dynamic acceleration range (DAR) instead only approaches that of time-resolved analysis for specific combinations of number of pulses and sequence timing. ME recordings are simulated from a time-resolved experiment around a wall-mounted cube, which yield equivalence between ME (4 pulses distributed onto 2 frames) and TR conditions. A demonstration of ME 3D-PTV for accelerometry and pressure from PIV is obtained, with experiments in the turbulent wake of a circular cylinder.