Facade refurbishment for energy saving in tube houses a case study in Hanoi, Vietnam

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Phan Anh Nguyen (TU Delft - Climate Design and Sustainability)

R.M.J. Bokel (TU Delft - Building Physics)

A.A.J.F. van den Dobbelsteen (TU Delft - Climate Design and Sustainability)

Research Group
Building Physics
Copyright
© 2019 P.A. Nguyen, R.M.J. Bokel, A.A.J.F. van den Dobbelsteen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911103015
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 P.A. Nguyen, R.M.J. Bokel, A.A.J.F. van den Dobbelsteen
Research Group
Building Physics
Volume number
111
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper investigated the energy upgrade potentials of different facade refurbishment options in tube houses of Vietnam. A calibrated Design Builder model was created to simulate energy performance of different cases. Vietnamese technical regulation of energy efficiency building and Dutch standards were the two main guidelines for selection of refurbishing measures. The simulation results showed that applying Vietnamese technical regulation can save up to 9% of energy for heating and cooling. More interestingly, highly insulated facade that followed Dutch standards led to much more favourable results of 21% reduction in air conditioner consumption. It is worth to note that such improvement was by far only achieved with a night-time operation of air-conditioner, as how the system was working in the reference house. Shading devices were also tested on a southwest facade window. Horizontal overhang had very limited benefit of less than 6% reduction in cooling energy. An external blind could save up to 12.6% of cooling energy. However, as all three shading types had a negative effect in heating season, the maximum annual saving was only 7%.

Files

E3sconf_clima2019_03015.pdf
(pdf | 1.59 Mb)
License info not available