Use of Formal Methods for verification and optimization of Fault Lists in the scope of ISO26262

Conference Paper (2018)
Author(s)

F. Silva (Cadence Design Systems)

Ahmet Cagri Bagbaba (Cadence Design Systems)

S. Hamdioui (TU Delft - Quantum & Computer Engineering)

Christian Sauer (Cadence Design Systems)

Research Group
Computer Engineering
Copyright
© 2018 F. Augusto da Silva, Ahmet Cagri Bagbaba, S. Hamdioui, Christian Sauer
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 F. Augusto da Silva, Ahmet Cagri Bagbaba, S. Hamdioui, Christian Sauer
Research Group
Computer Engineering
Bibliographical Note
Secure hardware@en
Pages (from-to)
1-6
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This work aims at an alternative method to verify the correctness of Fault Lists generated by fault simulators tools in context of safety verification. The lists generated by simulation tools are verified against lists from formal tools. The consistency evaluation between the lists supports the Tool Confidence Level (TCL) assessment, defined in the ISO26262. In addition, formal tools have the potential of performing optimization in Fault Lists by annotation of the expected behavior of the design under fault. Our work demonstrates the feasibility of using Formal Methods to verify and optimize the fault list from simulators. Results indicate an average reduction of 29.5% on the number of faults to be simulated and demonstrate that it is possible to achieve TCL by verification of the fault lists.

Files

11_1.pdf
(pdf | 0.653 Mb)
License info not available