A holistic framework for optimal ship energy system design, including operational requirements, lifetime cost, and vessel stability

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Foivos Mylonopoulos (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Andrea Coraddu (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Henk Polinder (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Research Group
Transport Engineering and Logistics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101685 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Transport Engineering and Logistics
Journal title
Energy Conversion and Management: X
Volume number
30
Article number
101685
Downloads counter
60
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Low total lifetime cost is essential for the adoption of zero-emission ship energy systems, which must meet operational power demands while complying with onboard safety regulations. However, many studies rely on a simplified, averaged or insufficiently representative load profile and treat system design, operation, and integration feasibility separately, which can distort lifetime cost assessments and result in practically infeasible retrofit concepts. This study investigates how a hydrogen-based ship energy system can be optimally sized, operated, and arranged onboard to minimize total lifetime cost while satisfying operational constraints and stability requirements for a general cargo vessel retrofit. A representative power profile is synthesized from one year of operational data using a probability-based downsampling method and then used in a mixed-integer nonlinear lifetime cost optimization with discrete placement and ballast decisions, solved using the SCIP solver. The optimal retrofit comprises 1.4 MW of fuel cells, 180 kWh of batteries, and a 146 m3 liquefied hydrogen (LH2) tank, requires 171 t of ballast to satisfy trim and vertical stability constraints, and is primarily driven by fuel costs, which account for 74% of the total lifetime cost. Overall, the results indicate that the viability of hydrogen-based ship retrofits primarily depends on LH2 storage integration constraints and hydrogen price assumptions, and that the proposed framework provides a practical basis for lifetime cost assessment of feasible retrofit designs.