Lateral-torsional buckling resistance of non-prismatic and prismatic mono-symmetric I-section steel beams based on stress utilization

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

J. O. Gomes (Universidade de Coimbra, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais)

L. Simões da Silva (Universidade de Coimbra)

T. Tankova (TU Delft - Steel & Composite Structures)

H. Carvalho (Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais)

J. O. Ferreira Filho (Universidade de Coimbra)

Research Group
Steel & Composite Structures
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117758
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Steel & Composite Structures
Journal title
Engineering Structures
Volume number
305
Article number
117758
Downloads counter
526
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The lateral-torsional resistance of prismatic double-symmetric I-section beams is accurately predicted using a mechanically consistent Ayrton-Perry approach, combined with a calibrated generalized imperfection. The corresponding design formulation was recently adopted in the revised version of Eurocode 3. However, for prismatic mono-symmetric I-section beams, the General Case shall be used while for non-prismatic beams only the General Method is available. Both methods present a very large scatter and highly underestimate the lateral-torsional buckling resistance. This paper proposes an extension to the General Formulation for non-prismatic beams with arbitrary boundary conditions, partial lateral restraints, and arbitrary loading for mono-symmetric I-sections. Using an advanced numerical model calibrated with experimental test results, a large parametric study is undertaken, and its results are used to assess the available design methodologies and the proposed method. It is concluded that the General Formulation provides excellent safe-sided estimates of the LTB resistance, and it is confirmed the very poor performance of the General Case and the General Method.