Depth estimation in SPAD-based LIDAR sensors

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Mingzhe Chen (Student TU Delft, Silicon Integrated B.V.)

P Rao (TU Delft - Electronic Instrumentation)

E. Venialgo (TU Delft - Optical Technologies)

Research Group
Optical Technologies
Copyright
© 2024 Mingzhe Chen, P. Ramachandra Rao, E. Venialgo Araujo
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.507975
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Copyright
© 2024 Mingzhe Chen, P. Ramachandra Rao, E. Venialgo Araujo
Research Group
Optical Technologies
Issue number
3
Volume number
32
Pages (from-to)
3006-3030
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In direct time-of-flight (D-TOF) light detection and ranging (LIDAR), accuracy and full-scale range (FSR) are the main performance parameters to consider. Particularly, in single-photon avalanche diodes (SPAD) based systems, the photon-counting statistics plays a fundamental role in determining the LIDAR performance. Also, the intrinsic performance ultimately depends on the system parameters and constraints, which are set by the application. However, the best-achievable performance directly depends on the selected depth estimation method and is not necessarily equal to intrinsic performance. We evaluate a D-TOF LIDAR system, in the particular context of smartphone applications, in terms of parameter trade-offs and estimation efficiency. First, we develop a simulation model by combining radiometry and photon-counting statistics. Next, we perform a trade-off analysis to study dependencies between system parameters and application constraints, as well as non-linearities caused by the detection method. Further, we derive an analytical model to calculate the Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB) of the LIDAR system, which analytically accounts for the shot noise. Finally, we evaluate a depth estimation method based on artificial intelligence (AI) and compare its performance to the CRLB. We demonstrate that the AI-based estimator fully compensates the non-linearity in depth estimation, which varies depending on application conditions such as target reflectivity.