A comparative analysis of side and stern installation of a monopile lifting operation using a heavy lift crane vessel

Conference Paper (2024)
Author(s)

A.M. Elzinga (Ulstein Design and Solutions B.V., Student TU Delft)

J.D. Stroo (Ulstein Design and Solutions B.V.)

A.A. Kana (TU Delft - Ship Design, Production and Operations)

Research Group
Ship Design, Production and Operations
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.59490/imdc.2024.822
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Ship Design, Production and Operations
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper compares two 2XL monopile installation methods: at the leeward side of the heavy lift crane vessel and in the recess at the stern of the vessel. The multi-body system of the vessel, monopile, crane, and mission equipment induces interaction and resonance behaviour. Operational limits are assessed at the crane tip and pile gripper during upending and lowering of the monopile. Stern installation provides a larger operability window during upending compared to side installation. During the lowering stage, the operability depends on the monopile submergence: side and stern installation provide a comparable operability. Considering both stages, stern installation shows promising results.