Do we use the Right Measure? Challenges in Evaluating Reward Learning Algorithms

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Nils Wilde (TU Delft - Learning & Autonomous Control)

Javier Alonso-Mora (TU Delft - Learning & Autonomous Control)

Research Group
Learning & Autonomous Control
Copyright
© 2023 N. Wilde, J. Alonso-Mora
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 N. Wilde, J. Alonso-Mora
Research Group
Learning & Autonomous Control
Volume number
205
Pages (from-to)
1553-1562
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Reward learning is a highly active area of research in human-robot interaction (HRI), allowing a broad range of users to specify complex robot behaviour. Experiments with simulated user input play a major role in the development and evaluation of reward learning algorithms due to the availability of a ground truth. In this paper, we review measures for evaluating reward learning algorithms used in HRI, most of which fall into two classes. In a theoretical worst case analysis and several examples, we show that both classes of measures can fail to effectively indicate how good the learned robot behaviour is. Thus, our work contributes to the characterization of sim-to-real gaps of reward learning in HRI.

Files

Wilde23a.pdf
(pdf | 0.817 Mb)
License info not available