Observation of the Josephson-Anderson relation in experiments on hydrodynamic drag

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

N. Savelli (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

AR Khojasteh (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

A.J.L.L. Buchner (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

J. Westerweel (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

W. van de Water (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Research Group
Fluid Mechanics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1103/bcwy-gt4l Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Fluid Mechanics
Journal title
Physical Review Fluids
Issue number
2
Volume number
11
Article number
024701
Page Views
67
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

We verify a recent prediction [Eq. (3.50) in Eyink, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031054 (2021)] for the drag on an object moving through a fluid. In this prediction the velocity field is decomposed into a nonvortical (potential) and vortical contribution, and so is the associated drag force. In the Josephson-Anderson relation the vortical contribution of the drag force follows from the flux of vorticity traversing the streamlines of the corresponding potential flow. The potential component is directly determined by the plate acceleration and its added mass. The Josephson-Anderson relation is derived from the quantum description of superfluids, but remarkably applies to the classical fluid in our experiment. In our experiment a flat plate is accelerated through water using a robotic arm. This geometry is simple enough to allow analytic potential flow streamlines. The monitored plate position shows an oscillatory component of the acceleration, which adds an additional test of the Josephson-Anderson relation. The instantaneous velocity field is measured using particle image velocimetry. It enables us to evaluate Eq. 3.50 from the above-mentioned paper and compare its prediction to the measured drag force. We find excellent agreement and, most remarkably, find that the added mass contribution to the drag force still stands out after the flow has turned vortical. We finally comment on the requirements for the experimental techniques for evaluating the Josephson-Anderson relation.