Bayesian Inference of Piping Model Uncertainties Based on Field Observations

Conference Paper (2019)
Author(s)

Wim Kanning (Deltares, TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Timo Schweckendiek (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-11-2725-0_IS4-9-cd
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Pages (from-to)
787-791
ISBN (electronic)
978-981-11-2725-0
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper presents a Bayesian model to determine the model uncertainty of a critical horizontal gradient model for piping for dikes, such a Lane and Bligh. A Bayesian model is needed for two reasons. First, there is a large overlap in cases that failed and survived. Second, the evidence of the failed cases is limited .The model consists of a non-informative prior that is combined with likelihood functions for failed and survived cases. This involves modeling the mean and standard deviation of the model uncertainty as random variables. For survived cases we know the limit state function was larger than 0 for the observed water level. For failed cases we know the limit state function was smaller than 0; or Z = 0; which is a less conservative assumption. This information is used to determine the likelihood functions for failed and survived cases. The prior and likelihoods are combined to find the posterior distributions of the mean and standard distribution of the model uncertainty. Using integration, this finally results in the (lognormal) distribution of the model uncertainty. The model is applied to the data of Bligh and Lane and shows both a high mean and high standard deviation of the model uncertainty, where the model of Lane performs better than Bligh. It is recommended to tailor the proposed model to dikes by making a different distinction between horizontal and vertical erosion. Furthermore, it is recommended to apply the model to more dike specific data since the Bligh data mainly consists of dams instead of dikes.

Files

IS4_9.pdf
(pdf | 0.708 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 13-06-2020
License info not available