Architectural design education

in varietate unitas

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

EJGC van Dooren (TU Delft - Architectural Engineering)

J. Van Merriënboer (Universiteit Maastricht)

H.P.A. Boshuizen (Open University of the Netherlands)

Machiel Van Dorst (TU Delft - Urbanism)

Thijs Asselbergs (TU Delft - Architectural Engineering)

Research Group
Architectural Engineering
Copyright
© 2017 E.J.G.C. van Dooren, J. van Merriënboer, H.P.A. Boshuizen, M.J. van Dorst, M.F. Asselbergs
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9396-1
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 E.J.G.C. van Dooren, J. van Merriënboer, H.P.A. Boshuizen, M.J. van Dorst, M.F. Asselbergs
Research Group
Architectural Engineering
Volume number
28 (2018)
Pages (from-to)
431-449
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

A fascinating and rich landscape of personal views and approaches can be seen in architectural design and in architectural design education. This variation may be confusing for students. This paper focuses on the question: is the framework of generic elements that we developed for explicating the design process helpful to compare the differences in architectural design approaches? The results of interviewing a variety of 15 architectural, urban and landscape designers show all kinds of personal approaches that have a set of five underlying generic elements in common. Therefore, the framework may be helpful for teachers and students to describe these personal approaches and may help students in understanding differences and similarities and in finding out what their own personal approach may be.