Effects of data ambiguity and cognitive biases on the interpretability of machine learning models in humanitarian decision making

Conference Paper (2019)
Author(s)

David Paulus (TU Delft - Policy Analysis)

G. de Vries (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

B.A. de Walle (TU Delft - Multi Actor Systems)

Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Copyright
© 2019 D. Paulus, G. de Vries, B.A. van de Walle
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 D. Paulus, G. de Vries, B.A. van de Walle
Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The effectiveness of machine learning algorithms depends on the quality and amount of data and the operationalization and interpretation by the human analyst. In humanitarian response, data is often lacking or overburdening, thus ambiguous, and the time-scarce, volatile, insecure environments of humanitarian activities are likely to inflict cognitive biases. This paper proposes to research the effects of data ambiguity and cognitive biases on the interpretability of machine learning algorithms in humanitarian decision making.