Position correction in dust storm forecasting using LOTOS-EUROS v2.1

Grid-distorted data assimilation v1.0

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

J. Jin (TU Delft - Mathematical Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

A Segers (TNO)

Hai-Xiang Lin (TU Delft - Mathematical Physics)

B Henzing (TNO)

Xiaohui Wang (TU Delft - Mathematical Physics)

A. W. Heemink (TU Delft - Mathematical Physics)

Hong Liao (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

Research Group
Mathematical Physics
Copyright
© 2021 J. Jin, Arjo Segers, H.X. Lin, Bas Henzing, X. Wang, A.W. Heemink, Hong Liao
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5607-2021
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 J. Jin, Arjo Segers, H.X. Lin, Bas Henzing, X. Wang, A.W. Heemink, Hong Liao
Research Group
Mathematical Physics
Issue number
9
Volume number
14
Pages (from-to)
5607–5622
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

When calibrating simulations of dust clouds, both the intensity and the position are important. Intensity errors arise mainly from uncertain emission and sedimentation strengths, while position errors are attributed either to imperfect emission timing or to uncertainties in the transport. Though many studies have been conducted on the calibration or correction of dust simulations, most of these focus on intensity solely and leave the position errors mainly unchanged. In this paper, a grid-distorted data assimilation, which consists of an image-morphing method and an ensemble-based variational assimilation, is designed for realigning a simulated dust plume to correct the position error. This newly developed grid-distorted data assimilation has been applied to a dust storm event in May 2017 over East Asia. Results have been compared for three configurations: a traditional assimilation configuration that focuses solely on intensity correction, a grid-distorted data assimilation that focuses on position correction only and the hybrid assimilation that combines these two. For the evaluated case, the position misfit in the simulations is shown to be dominant in the results. The traditional emission inversion only slightly improves the dust simulation, while the grid-distorted data assimilation effectively improves the dust simulation and forecasting. The hybrid assimilation that corrects both position and intensity of the dust load provides the best initial condition for forecasting of dust concentrations.