Size-dependent strength superiority in multi-principal element alloys versus constituent metals

Abstract

Multi-principal element alloys (MPEAs) are renowned for their enhanced mechanical strength relative to their constituent metals, as evidenced by various experimental techniques such as tension/compression tests and instrumental indentation. Nevertheless, atomistic simulations sometimes produce conflicting results, casting doubt on the consistently superior mechanical properties of MPEAs. In this study, machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) with first-principles accuracy were developed for body-centered cubic refractory MoNbTaW MPEAs, enabling systematic atomistic simulations under various deformation scenarios. The new MLIPs are supported by a comprehensive dataset encompassing extensive defects, and the established embedded-atom model (EAM) potential was benchmarked against both this dataset and the new MLIP. Simulations covering diverse compositions confirm that both MLIPs and EAM accurately capture the critical strengthening mechanisms in MoNbTaW MPEAs. It is revealed that MPEAs generally exhibit superior mechanical strength compared to their constituent metals in macroscale specimens, primarily due to solid solution strengthening during dislocation motion. However, at the nanoscale—where plasticity is predominantly governed by dislocation nucleation and grain boundary deformation—the constituent metals may outperform MPEAs. A critical length scale is identified above which MPEAs demonstrate enhanced mechanical strength relative to their constituent elements; below this scale, the advantage diminishes, underscoring a significant size-dependent effect that is crucial for optimizing MPEA applications, particularly at the nanoscale.