Surface roughness of 3D printed materials

Comparing physical measurements and human perception

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Jess Hartcher-O'Brien (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Jeremy Evers (Student TU Delft, Ultimaker)

Erik Tempelman (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Research Group
Human Technology Relations
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.01.008 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Research Group
Human Technology Relations
Journal title
Materials Today Communications
Volume number
19
Pages (from-to)
300-305
Downloads counter
233

Abstract

This study concerns the perceived roughness of 3D printed material samples (print process: fused deposition modelling, or FDM), generated across changes in print speed, build angle, and layer height. Physical sample surface roughness parameters Ra and Rq were first obtained via optical scanning. Next, using a custom-designed apparatus, surface roughness perception was assessed via a psychophysical procedure that identified the just noticeable difference in roughness through the sense of touch alone. By comparing both data sets, this study concludes that for FDM-printed materials, objective surface roughness parameters (Ra, Rq) cannot adequately predict users’ haptic experience. This finding is of importance for all 3D printing applications where equally perceptible roughness is desired. As a whole, the study highlights the role of 3D printing as a new tool for the science of haptics and as a means for generating new material qualities by design.