Coevolution of machine learning and process-based modelling to revolutionize Earth and environmental sciences

A perspective

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Saman Razavi (University of Saskatchewan, Global Institute for Water Security)

David M. Hannah (University of Birmingham)

Amin Elshorbagy (University of Saskatchewan)

Sujay Kumar (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)

Lucy Marshall (University of New South Wales)

Dimitri P. Solomatine (TU Delft - Water Resources, Water Problems Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)

Amin Dezfuli (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)

Mojtaba Sadegh (Boise State University)

James Famiglietti (Global Institute for Water Security)

Research Group
Water Resources
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14596 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Research Group
Water Resources
Journal title
Hydrological Processes
Issue number
6
Volume number
36
Article number
e14596
Downloads counter
214
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) applications in Earth and environmental sciences (EES) have gained incredible momentum in recent years. However, these ML applications have largely evolved in ‘isolation’ from the mechanistic, process-based modelling (PBM) paradigms, which have historically been the cornerstone of scientific discovery and policy support. In this perspective, we assert that the cultural barriers between the ML and PBM communities limit the potential of ML, and even its ‘hybridization’ with PBM, for EES applications. Fundamental, but often ignored, differences between ML and PBM are discussed as well as their strengths and weaknesses in light of three overarching modelling objectives in EES, (1) nowcasting and prediction, (2) scenario analysis, and (3) diagnostic learning. The paper ponders over a ‘coevolutionary’ approach to model building, shifting away from a borrowing to a co-creation culture, to develop a generation of models that leverage the unique strengths of ML such as scalability to big data and high-dimensional mapping, while remaining faithful to process-based knowledge base and principles of model explainability and interpretability, and therefore, falsifiability.