Modeling frontal low-level jets and associated extreme wind power ramps over the North Sea

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

B. Baki (TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing)

S. Basu (State University of New York at Albany, State University of New York)

George Lavidas (TU Delft - Offshore Engineering)

Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1575-2025
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
Issue number
8
Volume number
10
Pages (from-to)
1575–1609
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The increasing global demand for wind power underscores the importance of understanding and characterizing extreme ramp events, which are significant fluctuations in wind power generation over short periods that pose challenges for grid integration. This study focuses on modeling frontal low-level jets (FLLJs) and associated extreme ramp-down events, particularly their impact on wind power production at Belgium offshore wind farms. Using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, we analyzed five cases of extreme wind power ramp-down events, including in-depth analysis of two cases and generalization of three additional cases. We assessed the sensitivity of various model configurations, including initial and boundary condition (IC/BC) datasets (ERA5 and CERRA), the activation of Fitch wind farm parameterization (WFP), planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes, and single- versus nested-domain configuration. Our findings indicate that CERRA IC/BCs provide a superior representation of atmospheric flow compared to ERA5, resulting in more accurate predictions of ramp timing, intensity, and FLLJ characteristics. The WFP significantly impacts wind power output by modeling turbine interactions and wake effects, leading to slightly lower wind speeds. The scale-aware Shin and Hong PBL scheme yielded a stronger FLLJ core at higher altitudes with a more pronounced jet nose, although wind speeds below 200 m were lower compared to the Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino 2.5 scheme. Single-domain configuration proved more effective in simulating wind power ramps but had higher core heights and higher wind speeds below 200 m, resulting in a diffused jet profile. Our analysis highlights that reliable simulation of extreme ramps associated with FLLJs using a single-domain configuration could reduce computational costs. Further, the FLLJs and associated extreme ramps can be predicted 1 d in advance, offering substantial benefits for operational efficiency in wind energy management.