Chemsex

Associations with Sexual, Psychosocial and Social Health in Australian Gay and Bisexual Men

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Daniel Demant (Queensland University of Technology, University of Technology Sydney)

Bernard Saliba (University of Technology Sydney)

Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios (TU Delft - Values Technology and Innovation, TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

James D.A. Newton (University of Queensland)

Research Group
Safety and Security Science
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2554865 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Safety and Security Science
Journal title
Substance Use and Misuse
Issue number
2
Volume number
61
Pages (from-to)
287-295
Downloads counter
92
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Introduction: Chemsex, the use of psychoactive substances to enhance sexual experience, is most prominent in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). This study explores the prevalence of chemsex in Australian GBMSM (N = 632) and its associations with psychosexual and psychosocial health. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted. Measures included demographics, psychological distress, attitudes toward sexuality (Sex-Positivity-Negativity Scale), sexual self-esteem, LGBT Community Connectedness, and sexual behaviors. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and chi-square tests. Results: One-third (32.3%) reported engaging in chemsex in the past year. Those engaged in chemsex were younger and more likely to identify as Indigenous Australians. They reported higher levels of psychological distress, sex negativity, sexual self-esteem and satisfaction with their sex life. Men engaged in chemsex reported a lower degree of connectedness to the LGBT community and were more likely to report adventurous sexual behaviors, including group sex and creating pornographic imagery. Discussion: The association between chemsex and health is complex. While some men report higher sexual self-esteem and satisfaction, their reported involvement in chemsex also correlates with increased psychological distress and lower community connectedness; however, the directionality of associations is unclear and may reflect complex or bidirectional dynamics. Conclusions: Engagement in chemsex is common among Australian GBMSM and is associated with a range of mental health, sexual wellbeing, and social connection outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of developing informed, community-based public health strategies that reflect the complexity of chemsex practices and diverse experiences of men engaged in chemsex.