Navigating the discourse of planning history: insights for urban historians from the 20th IPHS biennial conference, Hong Kong, China

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

K. Zhu (TU Delft - History, Form & Aesthetics, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Yanchen Sun (Beijing University of Civil Engineering & Architecture)

Boyang Liu (Beijing University of Civil Engineering & Architecture)

Research Group
History, Form & Aesthetics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963926825100448
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
History, Form & Aesthetics
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Pages (from-to)
1-12
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The 20th biennial conference of the International Planning History Society (IPHS) was held in Hong Kong, China. Through a comprehensive analysis of the keynote speeches, panel presentations, roundtable discussions, excursions and IPHS awards, this report highlights key insights from the conference that are especially relevant to urban historians. It suggests that planning history not only acts as a tool for informing urban strategies but also offers critical perspectives on socio-political, environmental, and cultural dimensions of urban transformation. The report presents three key insights for urban historians: (1) the entangled planning histories of Hong Kong and Shenzhen reflect broader political, ideological and international ambitions of dominant powers; (2) the evolution of environmental histories when rethinking human–natural relations in urban transition; and (3) the emerging attention to marginalized voices and alternative archives to enrich dominant planning narratives. These together demonstrate how planning history offers a critical historiographical lens for interpreting urban transformation.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 01-03-2026