K. Zhu
Please Note
23 records found
1
Virtual reality in heritage education for enhanced learning experience
A mini-review and design considerations
Navigating the discourse of planning history
Insights for urban historians from the 20th IPHS biennial conference, Hong Kong, China
Fluid Ontologies
Colonial Legacies and an Indigenous Oceanic Worldview in the Sulu Archipelago
历史性城市景观保护的适应性再利用方法
立面主义的演变与作用
This research first analyzes the theoretical origins of Facadism and its evolution in heritage discourse by understanding and defining it. It also studies the impact generated by Facadism on heritage authenticity in practice. Secondly, since many cases of Toronto’s Facadism practice have received widespread recognition for their treatment of building − street linkage, this research identifies and reviews typical cases with the aim of exploring the factors that make Facadism successful in a particular context. By tracing the evolution of Facadism practice on Toronto’s Yonge Street over the course of the 21st century, the research reveals why Facadism has become the default strategy for adaptive reuse of historic buildings in Toronto, and its multiple impacts on heritage values, genius loci, collective identity, spatial perception, urban development and social justice. By reviewing public discussions, municipal decisions and theoretical perspectives, this research aims to analyze and explain the potential reasons for the successful practices of the Facadism strategy in adaptive reuse and its evolutionary path during implementation. To further explore the theoretical applicability of the concept of Facadism in China’s urban renewal under contextual transformation, this research introduces Shanghai’s extensive adaptive reuse practices and the use of related terms for comparative analysis.
Through an analysis of the adaption of the Bank of Montreal, the McLaughlin Showroom, and a row of Victorian buildings, this research categorizes the façade-led design strategies for adding high-rises on existing historic buildings into three groups: Sheet mode, podium mode, and attachment mode. The research also identifies similar approaches in adaptive reuse practices in Shanghai, such as the redevelopment of Jianyeli, Shangxianfang, and arcades on East Jinling Road. However, this research notes that although practitioners have used Facadism approache in Shanghai’s heritage adaption, the term “Facadism” is not introduced and known to the academia and the general public as a term or a keyword to describe a retrofitting strategy. Furthermore, in the China Knowledge Network database, there is no evidence of any papers or other results related to “Facadism” through keyword search. This research further suggests that the general idea of “adaptive reuse” for summarizing various heritage approaches can directly lead to two drawbacks in heritage conservation practice. On the one hand, it allows stakeholders to obfuscate concepts, to use slogans such as “conservation development” to disguise actual destructive operation of heritage in a speculative manner and to lower the public’s psychological line of defense against the destruction of cultural heritage. On the other hand, this leads to a lack of respect for the designation of significant heritage and conservation planning by stakeholders, requiring adjustments of legally valid conservation planning in implementation. This research further argues that the most alarming aspect of Facadism approach is not its outcome, but the impact on the integrated conservation of historic landscapes and the choice of values in the extensive urbanism process. In China’s post-2021 urban renewal, an increasing number of historic blocks, neighborhoods, and roads selected into the heritage list are facing the challenge of being transformed. This research argues for the introduction of more pragmatically oriented adaptive reuse concepts in contemporary urban renewal in China, preventing the hybridization and misuse of conservation concepts by stakeholders and maintaining the purity of heritage conservation principles. Overall, this research emphasizes the implications of Facadism in contemporary urban renewal from the perspective of heritage integrity and authenticity of the conservation of historic urban landscape. ...
This research first analyzes the theoretical origins of Facadism and its evolution in heritage discourse by understanding and defining it. It also studies the impact generated by Facadism on heritage authenticity in practice. Secondly, since many cases of Toronto’s Facadism practice have received widespread recognition for their treatment of building − street linkage, this research identifies and reviews typical cases with the aim of exploring the factors that make Facadism successful in a particular context. By tracing the evolution of Facadism practice on Toronto’s Yonge Street over the course of the 21st century, the research reveals why Facadism has become the default strategy for adaptive reuse of historic buildings in Toronto, and its multiple impacts on heritage values, genius loci, collective identity, spatial perception, urban development and social justice. By reviewing public discussions, municipal decisions and theoretical perspectives, this research aims to analyze and explain the potential reasons for the successful practices of the Facadism strategy in adaptive reuse and its evolutionary path during implementation. To further explore the theoretical applicability of the concept of Facadism in China’s urban renewal under contextual transformation, this research introduces Shanghai’s extensive adaptive reuse practices and the use of related terms for comparative analysis.
Through an analysis of the adaption of the Bank of Montreal, the McLaughlin Showroom, and a row of Victorian buildings, this research categorizes the façade-led design strategies for adding high-rises on existing historic buildings into three groups: Sheet mode, podium mode, and attachment mode. The research also identifies similar approaches in adaptive reuse practices in Shanghai, such as the redevelopment of Jianyeli, Shangxianfang, and arcades on East Jinling Road. However, this research notes that although practitioners have used Facadism approache in Shanghai’s heritage adaption, the term “Facadism” is not introduced and known to the academia and the general public as a term or a keyword to describe a retrofitting strategy. Furthermore, in the China Knowledge Network database, there is no evidence of any papers or other results related to “Facadism” through keyword search. This research further suggests that the general idea of “adaptive reuse” for summarizing various heritage approaches can directly lead to two drawbacks in heritage conservation practice. On the one hand, it allows stakeholders to obfuscate concepts, to use slogans such as “conservation development” to disguise actual destructive operation of heritage in a speculative manner and to lower the public’s psychological line of defense against the destruction of cultural heritage. On the other hand, this leads to a lack of respect for the designation of significant heritage and conservation planning by stakeholders, requiring adjustments of legally valid conservation planning in implementation. This research further argues that the most alarming aspect of Facadism approach is not its outcome, but the impact on the integrated conservation of historic landscapes and the choice of values in the extensive urbanism process. In China’s post-2021 urban renewal, an increasing number of historic blocks, neighborhoods, and roads selected into the heritage list are facing the challenge of being transformed. This research argues for the introduction of more pragmatically oriented adaptive reuse concepts in contemporary urban renewal in China, preventing the hybridization and misuse of conservation concepts by stakeholders and maintaining the purity of heritage conservation principles. Overall, this research emphasizes the implications of Facadism in contemporary urban renewal from the perspective of heritage integrity and authenticity of the conservation of historic urban landscape.
面向公众的历史工业景观
卢森堡贝尔瓦尔工业区的城市更新之路
This paper applies the experience of the transformation of the old industrial area of Belval,the second largest urban regeneration project in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in Europe,as a case study.discusses the path of transformation of a future-oriented historical industrial landscape.After introducing the development of industrial heritage,it specifically addresses and discusses the challenges and uncertainties that master planning in Belval regeneration has faced,from the surface to the point,from the whole to the part.This paper also analyses the different strategies for adapting industrial heritage and points out the need for adaptive reuse in transformation.It further reveals the problems and shortcomings of the Belval project's regeneration up to now and highlights the importance of sustainable transformation of historical industrial landscapes for enhancing community vitality. ...
This paper applies the experience of the transformation of the old industrial area of Belval,the second largest urban regeneration project in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in Europe,as a case study.discusses the path of transformation of a future-oriented historical industrial landscape.After introducing the development of industrial heritage,it specifically addresses and discusses the challenges and uncertainties that master planning in Belval regeneration has faced,from the surface to the point,from the whole to the part.This paper also analyses the different strategies for adapting industrial heritage and points out the need for adaptive reuse in transformation.It further reveals the problems and shortcomings of the Belval project's regeneration up to now and highlights the importance of sustainable transformation of historical industrial landscapes for enhancing community vitality.
Interview with Feng Gu
Revitalizing and Activating Canal Cities Through the Integrated Protection of Water Heritage of the Grand Canal
From Space to People
Navigating Capital-Led Urban Transformation in Shanghai Through Shui On Cases
In the Name of Conservation
Reflections on the Interpretation and Justification of China’s Urban Heritage Practices by Taking Shanghai’s Lilong Neighbourhoods as an Example
Temporalities and the conservation of cultural relic protection units
Legislative, economic and citizen times of the Bugaoli community in globalising Shanghai
The Social Dimension of Urban Transformation in Shanghai
Population Mobility, Modernity, and Globalization
Why Factory
The spatial significance of Architectural Education Buildings
Transformation of Urban Communities from Within
Residents’ Role in Lilong’s Attributive Switch Between Market-led Commodity and State-controlled Property