Opinion: Inferring process from snapshots of cloud systems

Review (2025)
Author(s)

Graham Feingold (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

Franziska Glassmeier (TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology)

Jianhao Zhang (University of Colorado, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

Fabian Hoffmann (Ludwig Maximilians University)

Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-10869-2025
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
Issue number
18
Volume number
25
Pages (from-to)
10869-10885
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The cloudy atmospheric boundary layer is a complex, open, dynamical system that is difficult to fully characterize through observations. Aircraft measurements provide cloud dynamical, thermodynamical, and microphysical properties along a flightpath, at high spatial/temporal resolution (order 10 m/0.1 s). These data are essentially contiguous "snapshots"in time of the state of the cloud and its environment. Polar-orbiting satellite-based remote sensing yields snapshots of retrieved cloud and aerosol properties once or twice a day at spatial scales on the order of 250 m, but these are usually averaged to scales of ≈20-100 km to reduce data variability. Neither approach tracks a parcel of air in time, a view that would yield more direct insights into the evolving system. Nevertheless, our long experience with aircraft and satellite-based remote sensing has taught us much about atmospheric processes, suggesting that one can gain insights into processes from these snapshots. Using mostly previously published work we present examples of collections of observation snapshots that reveal various degrees of process-level understanding. We couch the discussion in terms of the concepts of space-Time exchange, ergodicity, and process vs. observation timescales. It is our hope that this paper will encourage the atmospheric sciences community to explore the value of these concepts more deeply.