Lifestyle change modelling for climate change mitigation

Complementary strengths, policy support, and research avenues

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Laura Scherer (Universiteit Leiden)

Mariësse A.E. van Sluisveld (Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving)

Nicole J. van den Berg (TNO)

Stephanie Cap (Universiteit Leiden)

Agnese Fuortes (Universiteit Leiden, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM))

Lynn de Jager (TU Delft - Energy and Industry, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM))

Ryu Koide (TU Delft - Energy and Industry, National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies)

Arjan de Koning (Universiteit Leiden)

Giacomo Marangoni (TU Delft - Policy Analysis)

undefined More Authors

Research Group
Energy and Industry
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104256
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Energy and Industry
Journal title
Environmental Science and Policy
Volume number
173
Article number
104256
Downloads counter
86
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Lifestyle changes are an essential, complementary measure for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and, therefore, also an important ingredient to climate policy. Computational models of lifestyle changes and their contribution to climate change mitigation can provide valuable insights in support of decision-making by individuals and policymaking. In this Perspective, we examine four modelling approaches with this in mind: input-output analysis, life cycle assessment, integrated assessment models, and agent-based models. They have different strengths and weaknesses related to spatial and temporal scales, sector representation, consumer heterogeneity, and impact assessment. Despite their differences, all are ultimately suitable for modelling different types of climate-friendly lifestyle changes – from sufficiency over efficiency to modal shift measures. Each modelling approach provides useful, albeit partial, insights into lifestyle changes. The identified challenges call for both continual refinements within individual model frameworks and hybrid methods that bridge their respective strengths and allow for representing lifestyle changes more comprehensively. Together, they inform about the theoretical mitigation potential, initiative feasibility, behavioural plasticity, and policy effectiveness of lifestyle changes. Ultimately, cross-disciplinary collaboration will be key to designing lifestyle-focused policies that are both impactful and acceptable.