A novel independence test for somatic alterations in cancer shows that biology drives mutual exclusivity but chance explains most co-occurrence

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

Sander Canisius (Nederlands Kanker Instituut - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek ziekenhuis)

Lodewyk Wessels (Nederlands Kanker Instituut - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek ziekenhuis, TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

John W. M. Martens (Erasmus MC)

Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
Copyright
© 2016 Sander Canisius, L.F.A. Wessels, John W. M. Martens
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1114-x
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 Sander Canisius, L.F.A. Wessels, John W. M. Martens
Research Group
Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics
Issue number
261
Volume number
17
Pages (from-to)
1-17
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In cancer, mutually exclusive or co-occurring somatic alterations across genes can suggest functional interactions. Existing tests for such patterns make the unrealistic assumption of identical gene alteration probabilities across tumors. We present Discrete Independence Statistic Controlling for Observations with Varying Event Rates (DISCOVER), a novel test that is more sensitive than other methods and controls its false positive rate. A pan-cancer analysis using DISCOVER finds no evidence for widespread co-occurrence, and most co-occurrences previously detected do not exceed expectation by chance. Many mutual exclusivities are identified involving well-known genes related to cell cycle and growth factor signaling, as well as lesser known regulators of Hedgehog signaling.